That is what is happening in California. Read this article, and see what is happening for yourself. The article is intended to make us feel sorry for the illegal immigrants and their anchor babies, but this is what it really means:
A family with no skills, no education, and no money illegally immigrates into the US, and then has 4 anchor babies, with all medical expenses paid for on the government dime. Since the 4 kids are all citizens, the family now gets welfare, food stamps, housing assistance, free cell phones, and free college educations.
The college alone costs $27,000 a year, for a total cost to the US taxpayer of $432,000 for all four kids. In all, a rough calculation shows that this family has cost the US taxpayer more than $2 million in assistance since the illegal immigrant parents arrived here roughly 30 years ago.
The government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always count on the enthusiastic support of Paul, or in this case, Pedro.
6 comments:
Ah, but why is Peter obeying? What greater level of injury would it take for Peter to stop obeying, and defend himself? Peter wouldn't even write in Ron Paul or Ross Perot for president. Given that the German Jews voluntarily got on the boxcars, I'm not sure Peter would give up his religion of government for anything. Peter is exhibiting both physical courage and intellectual cowardice.
Honestly? I think that Peter IS fighting back, and I think that Donald Trump's election is a direct result of that.
To simply stop obeying the law? That will not happen. People have homes, lives, families and a way of life to protect. Very few of them are going to want to throw all of that away and leave their family penniless in a pointless gesture of disobedience. That road leads to a lifetime in prison, or in you and your family having everything you own taken from you, or even death by police firing squad.
Write in votes for that nutbag Ron Paul? Even if people wanted to, a write in campaign won't work. Ron Paul couldn't even muster enough vote to win a primary, much less the election.
All those scenarios of Peter being Waco'ed by the powers that be assume there are only 1K Peters among 300M Americans. But if there are 10M or 30M Peters, then they can write in Mickey Mouse for president if they want to and they are too numerous for the powers that formerly were to digest them. Donald Trump's election suggests the numbers of Peters are high enough to be self-supporting.
To simply stop obeying the law? That will not happen. People have homes, lives, families and a way of life to protect. Very few of them are going to want to throw all of that away and leave their family penniless in a pointless gesture of disobedience. That road leads to a lifetime in prison, or in you and your family having everything you own taken from you, or even death by police firing squad.
Didn't work out that way for the 250,000 not obeying gun registration in Connecticut in 2014.
So when did you stop paying taxes? How many machine guns have you built?
Know how to spot the FBI informant? He is the one urging you to break the law. No thanks.
How much of their way of life have conservatives successfully conserved? I could tell Trump was not a reformer when he made his cabinet picks in January, so electing him does not count as Peter successfully fighting back.
Obeying at each of these steps didn't work out for the whole group of German Jews: register guns, turn in guns, collect into ghettos, give up livelihood, get into boxcars. I suspect the steps in your original post will also turn out to be losers long-term. 'Don't make trouble' isn't a winning strategy.
Post a Comment