“They’re imposing repressive Cuban laws on American citizens,” says Maria de los Angeles Torres, a respected expert on Cuba and a longtime pro-engagement and anti-embargo academic who directs Latin American and Latino studies at the University of Illinois in Chicago. “It’s like they’re bringing Cuban law here.”
Why is this?
Current Cuban law prohibits Cuban-born individuals from entering Cuba via ship or other sea vessel, regardless of U.S. citizenship status. For that reason, at the present time, Fathom cannot accommodate Cuban-born individuals.
Following the law is not discrimination. The US has a no fly list. Air carriers are required to follow the law if they want to fly here. This is exactly what is happening here. Does the Herald expect the world to continue the Cuban boycott? Or is it time to tear down the wall?
Another problem that I have with the article is this:
Forty-seven years in this country, 36 as a U.S. citizen, a voter — and I cannot sail on an American cruise ship because Cuba says so.
The Carnival ship in question is not an American ship: It is registered in Bermuda.
Finally, there is this:
Something precious is lost when a foreign government dictates what kinds of U.S. citizens can sail out of the Port of Miami.
That isn't what is happening. Cuba is not dictating what kind of people can sail out of Miami, as Cubans are free to sail from that port any time they wish. What Cuba is doing is dictating who can enter THEIR country.
1 comment:
For what it's worth, I read that the other day and had exactly the same take on it as you do. I see the cruise line as being caught in the middle on this. They have to comply with the laws on both ends of the cruise.
Post a Comment